LAWYER SEEKS COURT ORDER TO CARRY AK-47
Fiery human rights lawyer, Chief Malcolm Omirhobo, has sued the Federal Government at the Federal High Court, Abuja seeking an order of the court to bear AK-47 automatic rifle.
Omirhobo, who confirmed levying the suit to CITY LAWYER, also alleged in the suit that the Federal Government has refused to respect the right of Nigerians to keep and bear arms for the preservation of life, liberty and property.
Among the respondents in the suit is the president of Nigeria, the Attorney general of the federation and 74 others.
When the suit came up today, only Lagos, Ebonyi, Adamawa, Akwa Ibom and Edo states were represented in court by lawyers while others sought adjournment of the hearing of the suit.
The judge, Justice Ahmed Mohammed, adjourned the suit to 24 January, 2023 for hearing. He also ordered that the processes including hearing notice be served on the respondents that were yet to be served.
In an originating summon marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1078/2021, Omirhobo stated that the plaintiff and Nigerian citizens are entitled to “right to life, right to dignity of human person, right to personal liberty, right to private and family life, right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association, right to freedom of movement and to reside anywhere in Nigeria and right to own movable and immovable property in Nigeria except when these rights are being derogated or limited by law.”
He asked the court to say whether, by the combined interpretation and/or construction of Sections 3, 6(2)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e) of the Fire Arms Act, Laws of the Federation, 2004 and sections 33(1)(2)(a)(b), 34(1)(a), 35(1), 36, 37, 43 of the 1999 Constitution; sections 281, 282, 286 and 287 of the Criminal Code Act and sections 40, 45, 46 and 47 of the Penal Code Act, it is lawful, legal and constitutional for the 2nd defendant to refuse, fail and/or neglect to grant the plaintiff license to possess and own an A6 147 premium, AK 47 Assault Rifle based on the plaintiff’s application of July 8, 2021, to enable him to exercise his constitutional right to self defence.
He stated that the suit is aimed to protect his life, family and property and also for the safeguard of his fundamental rights as enshrined and guaranteed by the constitution in the face of the high level of insecurity ravaging Nigeria and the inability of the defendants to meet up with their primary responsibility of protecting life and property from the attacks of heavily and well-armed criminals with AK 47, General Purpose Machine Guns (GPMG) and other sophisticated weapons.
In a 123-paragraph affidavit, Omirhobo said the constitution guarantees every Nigerian citizen the fundamental rights to dignity of the human person, personal liberty, private and family life, peaceful assembly and association, freedom of movement and right to own moveable and immoveable property. He added that the constitution gives every Nigerian the right to defend his fundamental rights from unlawful violence.
He said: “In collaboration with the Nigerian constitution, both the Criminal Code Act and Penal Code Act gives every Nigerian citizen the right to self defence by applying the use of such force as they believe on reasonable grounds to be necessary to prevent their fundamental rights to life, the dignity of the human person, personal, liberty, private and family life, peaceful assembly and association, freedom of movement and right to own moveable and immoveable property from unlawful violence.”
Omirhobo prayed the court to declare that the killings, raping, sodomising, extorting, kidnapping, abduction brutalisation, dehumanisation, debasement, destruction of property, the restriction of the freedom of movement and right of residence, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, family and private life and the seizing of property of defenceless Nigerians by heavily armed criminals with unlicensed AK 47 Assault rifle, GPMG and other sophisticated weapons is a violation of these rights and therefore illegal, unlawful and unconstitutional.
He urged the court to declare that it is legal, lawful and constitutional for the 2nd defendant to revoke the gun licenses of Nigerians via proclamation and/or executive order in the face of the high level of insecurity in Nigeria and thereby depriving them of their rights to self-defence and in the process exposing them to the way of harms in the hands of heavily armed criminals with AK 47 Assault rifles GPMG and other sophisticated weapons.
The applicant, according to a news report, therefore asked the court for an order compelling the 2nd defendant and 4th defendant (Inspector General of Police with all the commissioners of police in Nigeria) to renew all expired gun licenses upon application of all Nigerians who are qualified to retain their gun licenses to enable them to exercise their rights to self-defence and safeguard their fundamental rights as guaranteed by the Nigerian constitution from the attacks of heavily and well-armed criminals with sophisticated weapons.
To join our Telegram platform, please click here
COPYRIGHT 2022 CITY LAWYER. Please send emails to email@example.com. Join us on Facebook at https://web.facebook.com/City-Lawyer-Magazine-434937936684320 and on TWITTER at https://twitter.com/CityLawyerMag. To ADVERTISE in CITY LAWYER, please email firstname.lastname@example.org or call 08138380083. All materials available on this Website are protected by copyright, trade mark and other proprietary and intellectual property laws. You may not use any of our intellectual property rights without our express written consent or attribution to www.citylawyermag.com. However, you are permitted to print or save to your individual PC, tablet or storage extracts from this Website for your own personal non-commercial use.