BY MONDAY UBANI

Today’s passage of the historic State Police Bill marks a significant turning point in Nigeria’s constitutional and security history. With the passage of the Bill by the Senate, following its earlier passage by the House of Representatives, Nigeria has taken a bold and historic step toward restructuring its internal security architecture in a manner more consistent with the principles of federalism.

For many years, I have consistently advocated for the establishment of State Police as an indispensable component of a truly federal system of government. At a time when the proposal was viewed with skepticism and apprehension in some quarters, I maintained that the centralized policing structure inherited from a unitary mindset could not effectively address the peculiar security challenges confronting a vast and diverse federation such as Nigeria.

Today, that advocacy has found legislative expression. The passage of the State Police Bill represents a major milestone in Nigeria’s quest to create a more responsive, efficient, and community-oriented security framework. It is a recognition of the reality that security challenges are often local in nature and require local solutions driven by those who understand the language, culture, terrain, and dynamics of the communities affected.

The growing wave of insecurity across the country have manifested in terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, communal violence, farmer-herder conflicts, armed robbery, and other forms of criminality. These have exposed the limitations of an over-centralized policing system. For decades, security experts, constitutional scholars, traditional rulers, civil society groups, and concerned citizens have argued that effective policing must be brought closer to the people.

The National Assembly has now responded to that call.
The significance of this development cannot be overstated. It is not merely a security reform. It is a constitutional acknowledgment that the challenges of modern governance require a rethinking of old structures that have become increasingly incapable of meeting contemporary realities.

However, while the passage of the bill deserves commendation, it would be premature to conclude that the concerns surrounding State Police have been completely addressed.
One of the major fears expressed over the years has been the possibility of abuse by State Governors.

Critics have consistently warned that State Police could be transformed into instruments of political intimidation, electoral manipulation, suppression of dissent, and harassment of opposition figures.

These concerns were neither imaginary nor unfounded, given our political experience as a nation.
It is therefore reassuring that the legislative process reportedly incorporated certain safeguards aimed at preventing abuse and ensuring accountability. Civil society organisations, professional bodies, and constitutional advocates had consistently called for institutional checks and balances to prevent the emergence of what some described as “Governor-controlled police forces.”

Whether the safeguards contained in the bill are sufficient to achieve that objective remains an issue that can only be tested by experience and implementation. The true measure of the reform will not lie in the text of the law alone but in the strength of the institutions established to enforce it.

For State Police to succeed, recruitment, promotion, discipline, and operational control must be insulated from partisan political interference. Oversight mechanisms must remain independent and effective and human rights protections must be rigorously enforced.

Most importantly, the judiciary must remain vigilant and prepared to intervene whenever constitutional boundaries are threatened by government officers.

Yet beyond these concerns lies an even more fundamental issue that has not received the attention it deserves. And that is that State Police cannot fully achieve its objectives in the absence of functional local government administration. This point cannot be overemphasized.

Security is most effective when it is rooted in the community. Intelligence gathering, crime prevention, dispute resolution, and early warning systems all begin at the grassroots. The local government is constitutionally designed to be the closest tier of government to the people and should ordinarily serve as the foundation upon which community security structures are built.

Unfortunately, the reality in many parts of Nigeria is that local governments have become weak institutions with limited autonomy, inadequate resources, and diminished capacity to perform their constitutional responsibilities. In some cases, they exist largely as administrative extensions of state governments rather than independent centres of grassroots governance.

This reality raises an important question and that is whether State Policing system can truly succeed if the local government system remains dysfunctional?

My answer is that it would be extremely difficult.
The mere transfer of policing powers from the Federal Government to State Governments does not automatically translate into effective grassroots security. Without strong local institutions capable of facilitating community engagement and intelligence gathering, the security architecture will still suffer from a disconnect between law enforcement agencies and the people they are expected to protect.

A truly effective federal security structure should mirror Nigeria’s three-tier system of government. The Federal Government should continue to handle national security, terrorism, border protection, and inter-state crimes while State Governments should coordinate state-level policing and law enforcement. On the other hand, Local Governments should serve as the grassroots hubs for community policing, local intelligence, conflict prevention, and citizen participation.

Anything short of this integrated approach may produce a State Police system that is operationally active but strategically incomplete.

As Nigeria moves closer to implementing this historic reform, policymakers must therefore look beyond the constitutional amendment itself and focus on the broader institutional ecosystem necessary for its success. These include strengthening local government autonomy, empowering community security structures, promoting transparency, ensuring professional recruitment standards, and guaranteeing effective oversight mechanisms.

The passage of the State Police Bill is undoubtedly a landmark achievement. It reflects the willingness of the present 10th National Assembly to confront one of the most pressing challenges facing the nation and to embrace reforms that many considered inevitable.

However, history teaches us that the success of any constitutional reform is determined not by its enactment but by its implementation.

The task before Nigeria is therefore not merely to celebrate the birth of State Police, but to ensure that it evolves into a professional, accountable, community-driven institution capable of enhancing security without undermining democratic freedoms.

As one who has long advocated for this reform, I welcome this historic milestone. Yet I also recognize that the journey has only just begun. The real work now lies in building the institutions, safeguards, and grassroots structures that will transform State Police from a constitutional provision into a genuine instrument of peace, security, and national development.

If we get it right, which is a prayer point for me, future generations may look back on this moment as the beginning of a new era in Nigeria’s security governance. If we get it wrong, we may merely have decentralized existing problems without solving them.

The choice, and the responsibility, now belong to all of us.

• Dr Monday Ubani SAN is a Legal Practitioner and Policy Analyst.

(C) CITY LAWYER Magazine. All rights reserved. To join our Channel, click here. Click here to join our WhatsApp chatroom. Contact us at citylawyermag@gmail.com or 081-3838-0083.