File manager

The Nigerian Police Force and some human rights activists have disagreed sharply on the conditions to be met for party supporters to assemble for rallies.<\/span><\/p>\n

The controversy was triggered by a tweet by Lagos State Police Command spokesman, Mr. Benjamin Hundeyin when he tweeted: \u201cNo procession on the expressway. Be guided!!!\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Hundeyin had also stated that \u201cthe Command will equally live up to its mandate of ensuring that no person or group of persons is allowed to infringe on the fundamental human rights of others, especially the rights to freedom of movement and right to dignity of human persons, especially under the guise of rally or procession.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Fiery human rights activist, Mr. Inibehe Effiong quickly responded, saying: \u201cWhy is it so difficult for the Police to abide by the rule of law? The police has no right to stop or disrupt political procession, irrespective of the size. By Section 91 of the Electoral Act, your role is limited to provision of security. You\u2019re deviating from the court order.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

In an effort to douse the controversy, Hundeyin explained that \u201cThis is quite a touchy issue. Let me rephrase. Hindering anybody\u2019s fundamental right to freedom of movement will not be allowed. A procession of the magnitude being planned would likely obstruct free flow of traffic. We have a duty to look out for all Nigerians.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

This only ended up stoking the controversy when one of the leaders of the ENDARS Movement, Ms. Rinu Oduala in several tweets stated that \u201cYou have traffic wardens. Your job is to provide (sic) traffic.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

She warned the police against disrupting the rallies aimed to bolster support for the Labour Party candidate, Mr. Peter Obi. Her words: \u201cYou don\u2019t have any right to prevent freedom of gathering and association tomorrow. You will tell us whether those people are not Nigerians.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

In yet another tweet, Oduala said: \u201cYou are not the judge. Nobody said people can proceed on the expressway. You can shoot though. Not like this is your first time.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Tweeting at @RuleofLawNG, Rule of Law Nigeria also disagreed with the police spokesman, saying: \u201cUsing these rationales, @PoliceNG have removed the right to protest from the Constitution. If a protest could inconvenience any person, the protest cannot hold. If the protest could be of a large magnitude, as imagined by the police, the protest cannot hold.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Hundeyin had in a statement issued on the eve of the rallies stated that \u201cThe warning therefore goes that anyone found flouting the court order or infringing on the rights of other Nigerians will be dealt with in accordance with the law. Meanwhile, CP Alabi enjoins all peace loving persons to go about their lawful duties without fear of harassment or intimidation, reiterating that adequate security assets have been strategically deployed to ensure the safety and security of Nigerians at designated rally venues and across the state at large.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Justice Daniel Osiagor of the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos had last Wednesday ordered the Labour Party and its supporters not to converge on the Lekki toll gate for its #Obidatti23 Forward Ever Rally billed to hold on October 1 2022, even as the court held that the supporters can pass through the Toll Gate to access Falomo Bridge and other venues. Justice Osiagor had directed the Inspector General of Police and the Lagos State Police Commissioner to ensure compliance with the order.<\/span><\/p>\n

The court made the orders while ruling on a motion for injunction brought by 10 plaintiffs through their counsel, Mr. Romeo Ese Michael, asking the court to, among others, restrain the LP, its presidential candidate Peter Obi, his vice Yusuf Datti Baba-Ahmed, one Julius Abure and their loyalists from holding the rally until the hearing and determination of their Motion on Notice of September 12, 2022.<\/span><\/p>\n

However, a preliminary objection filed by the defendants seeking to stop the court from hearing the motion on the grounds that it lacked jurisdiction could not be entertained as all parties to the suit had not been served. The court adjourned hearing of the substantive suit to November 4, 2022.<\/span><\/p>\n

In the substantive suit, the plaintiffs argued that a repeat or celebration of the \u201cinfamous\u201d EndSARS protest of 2020 under the political guise of \u201c#Obidatti23 Forward Ever Rally\u201d will cause a breakdown of peace and will result in post-traumatic stress disorder for them and the public.<\/span><\/p>\n

They prayed the court for four reliefs as follows:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAn order of interim injunction restraining the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants; their associates and loyalists from conducting the scheduled END SARS Rally tagged as the \u201c#Obidatti23 Forward Ever Rally on the 1st of October, 2020 or any other subsequent date, at the Lekki Toll Gate until the hearing and determination of the Motion-On-Notice dated September 12, 2022.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAn order of interim injunction restraining the 1st 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants and their loyalists from further planning and promoting the Scheduled END SARS Rally tagged as the \u201c#Obidatti23 Forward Ever Rally\u201d\u2026.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAn order of interim injunction restraining the 5th 6th, 7th Defendants from allowing or granting permissions to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants, their agents and the organizers of \u201c#Obidatti23 Forward Ever Rally\u201d at the behest of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants from carrying out the said anniversary on the 1st of October, 2022 and any other subsequent date\u2026<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAn order of interim injunction restraining the 8th Defendant (LCC) from granting permission to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants; their agents, privies, allies and loyalists, to make use of the Lekki Toll Gate or any space under and within the control of the 8th Defendant for carrying out the said anniversary on the 1st of October, 2022 and any other subsequent date\u2026\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The plaintiffs are Adedotun Ajulo Esq., Salamatu Suleiman Lewi Esq., Hakeem Ijaduola, Esq., Ogunbona Akinpelu Esq., Owolabi K. Oluwasegun, Esq., Mogbojuri Kayode Esq., Wuyep Mantim Nadom Esq., Dimimu Mabel, Esq., Kolawole Salami, Esq. and Mr. Wale Abe Lawrence.<\/span><\/p>\n

The 1st to 10th defendants are Obi, LP, Baba-Ahmed, Abure, the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Commissioner of Police (Lagos State Command), Director-General (Department of State Services), Lekki Concession Company (LCC) Limited, Attorney-General of Lagos State and the Governor of Lagos State.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

To join our Telegram platform, please click <\/span>here<\/span><\/b><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

COPYRIGHT<\/span><\/strong> 2022 CITY LAWYER. Please send emails to <\/span>citylawyermag@gmail.com<\/span><\/i><\/b><\/a>.<\/span><\/strong> Join us on Facebook at <\/span>https:\/\/web.facebook.com\/City-Lawyer-Magazine-434937936684320<\/span><\/b><\/a> and on TWITTER at <\/span>https:\/\/twitter.com\/CityLawyerMag<\/span><\/b><\/a>.<\/span> To <\/span>ADVERTISE<\/span><\/strong> in CITY LAWYER, please email citylawyermag@gmail.com or call 08138380083. All materials available on this Website are protected by copyright, trade mark and other proprietary and intellectual property laws. You may not use any of our intellectual property rights without our express written consent or attribution to <\/span>www.citylawyermag.com<\/span><\/b><\/em><\/a>. However, you are permitted to print or save to your individual PC, tablet or storage extracts from this Website for your own personal non-commercial use.<\/span><\/p>\n