The case of Edun v. Governor of Delta State has sparked significant debate over the principle of locus standi in Nigeria, particularly in the context of public interest litigation.

The appellant, a concerned citizen, taxpayer, and legal practitioner, challenged provisions in the Pension Rights of the Governor and Deputy Governor of Delta State Law, Cap. P5, Laws of Delta State, 2008, which granted substantial financial benefits to former governors and their deputies. The appellant argued that these provisions violated the Nigerian Constitution and undermined fiscal responsibility.

Despite his impassioned argument, both the trial court and the Court of Appeal dismissed the lawsuit, ruling that the appellant lacked the standing to sue.

This decisions have come under the searchlight of many jurists, with some arguing that it reflects a restrictive interpretation of locus standi which limits public interest litigation and stands in contrast with global trends that favour expanding access to justice.

Global Comparisons:
India: Indian courts have been at the forefront of liberalizing locus standi, particularly under Article 32 of the Constitution. Landmark cases, such as Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India, demonstrate a proactive judicial stance, where the courts actively encourage public interest litigation (PIL) to address social issues.

United Kingdom: The UK moved away from restrictive approaches in R v. Inspectorate of Pollution, ex-parte Greenpeace, allowing non-governmental organizations and individuals to challenge administrative decisions that affect public interests, promoting greater citizen participation in environmental and governance matters.

South Africa: The 1996 Constitution of South Africa broadened the scope of locus standi, giving individuals and organizations more extensive rights to approach the courts on matters of public interest. This move was seen as a crucial step toward promoting democracy and ensuring that public officials are held accountable.

Edun v. Governor of Delta State highlights the need for judicial reforms in Nigeria towards adopting a more liberal interpretation of locus standi, especially when dealing with public interest issues and financial accountability.

Reforming the legal framework will ensure that citizens can challenge policies or laws that may be harmful to public welfare, without unnecessary legal barriers. Accordingly, the appellant is encouraged to escalate the matter to the Supreme Court, where recent rulings suggest a broader interpretation of locus standi might gain traction.

The case underscores the need for judicial reforms to align Nigeria’s legal system with global best practices in public interest litigation. While other countries have embraced a more inclusive and expansive approach to locus standi, Nigeria’s restrictive stance limits citizens’ ability to hold public officials accountable. As a result, judicial reform is essential to ensure that justice is accessible and that public interest is adequately represented in legal proceedings.

To join our CITY LAWYER Channel on WhatsApp, click here

To join our Telegram platform, click here 

COPYRIGHT 2022 CITY LAWYER. Please send emails to citylawyermag@gmail.com. Join us on Facebook at https://web.facebook.com/City-Lawyer-Magazine-434937936684320 and on “X” (TWITTER) at https://twitter.com/CityLawyerMag. To ADVERTISE in CITY LAWYER or for Special Features, please email citylawyermag@gmail.com or call 08138380083.

All materials available on this Website are protected by copyright, trade mark and other proprietary and intellectual property laws. You may not use any of our intellectual property rights without our express written consent or attribution to www.citylawyermag.com. However, you are permitted to print or save to your individual PC, tablet or storage extracts from this Website for your own personal non-commercial use.