By Bayo Akinlade

What is NBA doing? What is CLASFON doing? What is MULAN doing? What is NACL doing? What is FIDA doing? What is AWLA doing? SPIDEL, SBL, SLP, YLF etc what are they all doing?

As we approach the end of another Legal Year, I have nothing encouraging to say nor can I place my finger on any solid progress the Judiciary and the NBA has made in this 2022/2023 Legal Year; save for the proposed increases in salaries and the extension of the retirement age of judges of the superior courts. This leaves the lower courts unattended – a very myopic and unfortunate outcome of the independence of the judiciary movement.

My observations here will however be centered on the awkward relationship between the Bar and the Bench, resulting in the run-down infrastructure of our courts.

When some of my colleagues argue that it is not the responsibility of the Bar to support or even provide for our court’s infrastructure, I quiver in shock because in many instances, individual legal practitioners are known for contributing, supporting and doing the very thing the NBA as an Association refuses to do, acknowledge and understand.

Many do not know that providing support to the judiciary is the number one objective of NBA as stated in the NBA’s constitution; but most NBA leaders don’t care or simply haven’t read the NBA constitution.

Let’s ask some questions here:

  1. Who are the users of the Courts?
  2. Who benefits the most from a good and conducive Court environment?
  3. Does a comfortable Court environment improve justice delivery?
  4. Does a Court with full functionality encourage productivity?
  5. Are Clients willing to pay more for legal services when they see a fully functional court environment?

Whatever our answers are to these questions, one thing is clear: if the Bar and Bench cannot cooperate to ensure that our courts are comfortable for users and managers of the courts, then we have failed the country.

In my opinion, I adjudge that the failure is more on the part of the NBA. I do not come to this conclusion lightly, but considering the high corruption levels in government and the challenges of financial allocations to the judiciary, the NBA should play its constitutional role and bridge the gap instead of paying lip service and complaining about the judiciary.


A few years ago, NBA Ikorodu Branch procured a generator and fans to support the court’s infrastructure.

Before then, the court’s generator was constantly having fault, putting the judges and magistrates in very uncomfortable situations. This negatively impacted on justice delivery, as many cases had to be adjourned.

NBA Ikorodu Branch through its leaders identified that the combined value of the total financial expense of litigants, the value of the time of lawyers present in court, the value of salaries paid to court staff and judges all combined outweighed any politically correct position that suggested that the Bar wasn’t to interfere or contribute to Court infrastructure. It was a no-brainer to procure a generator and fans to make the working conditions better…And it did. Our Judges and Magistrates worked harder and better because they were comfortable.

Today, unfortunately our NBA Branch in Ikorodu has forgotten what it means to make a difference in their workspace; our judges are the ones paying for the fuel to run the NBA generator. Sometimes they pay for the diesel for the main court generator. Should this be? Some judges and magistrates even purchase their own chairs and other basic electronic facilities like printers, computers etc. This is totally unacceptable.

The NBA will spend Billions of Naira on a 5-day conference but cannot find it necessary to invest in the welfare of its members by supporting our justice infrastructure. I mean can we not see that the welfare of NBA members is tied to an improved court infrastructure?

How can we argue that it is the responsibility of government alone? If this was the case, why do we take government to court to protect people’s rights and other noble causes; afterall we have many government funded human rights institutions, committees and agencies supposedly protecting the rights of citizens. Is it not the right of every citizen to have unfettered access to justice?

I call on NBA National, NLS, NBA Branch leaders, leaders of all religious, professional and gender based lawyer groups to reassess the conditions of the courts and work together with the Judiciary to ensure that citizens get the best out of our justice delivery system.

Enough of spending huge amounts on irrelevant parties, cocktails, retreats and law week programs that make no impact other than stroking the egos of some lawyers and which has become an opportunity to enrich some individuals.

  • Bayo Akinlade is the Publicity Secretary of the Nigerian Law Society

Judges and Magistrates are lawyers like the rest of us. The Bench is merely an appointment structure. If the judiciary is corrupt, weak, underfunded or ineffective then it’s the fault of us lawyers and by extension the fault of NBA and its weak, ineffective leadership!

To join our CITY LAWYER ROUNDTABLE on WhatsApp, click here 

To join our Telegram platform, click here 

COPYRIGHT 2022 CITY LAWYER. Please send emails to citylawyermag@gmail.com. Join us on Facebook at https://web.facebook.com/City-Lawyer-Magazine-434937936684320 and on TWITTER at https://twitter.com/CityLawyerMag. To ADVERTISE in CITY LAWYER, please email citylawyermag@gmail.com or call 08138380083.

All materials available on this Website are protected by copyright, trade mark and other proprietary and intellectual property laws. You may not use any of our intellectual property rights without our express written consent or attribution to www.citylawyermag.com. However, you are permitted to print or save to your individual PC, tablet or storage extracts from this Website for your own personal non-commercial use.